Arizona Us House of Representatives Election Results 2018
2018 Arizona House elections | |
---|---|
General | November 6, 2018 |
Chief | Baronial 28, 2018 |
2018 elections | |
---|---|
Choose a chamber below: | |
Republicans maintained their majority despite losing seats in the 2022 elections for the Arizona House of Representatives, winning 31 seats to Democrats' 29. All threescore House seats were up for election. At the time of the ballot, Republicans held 35 seats to Democrats' 25.
The Republican Party maintained its trifecta in Arizona in 2022 by holding its majorities in the state Senate and House and past retaining the governorship.
The Arizona Business firm of Representatives was ane of 87 state legislative chambers property elections in 2018. There are 99 chambers throughout the land.
Arizona state representatives serve 2-year terms, with all seats upwards for election every 2 years. At that place are xxx multi-member state House districts that elect ii members each.
For more than information near the Democratic primary, click here.
For more data about the Republican primary, click here.
Mail service-ballot assay
- Meet also: State legislative elections, 2018
The Republican Party maintained control of both chambers of the Arizona State Legislature in the 2022 election. The Arizona Land Senate was identified as a battlefield chamber. All thirty seats were up for ballot. The Republican majority was maintained at 17-13. No incumbents were defeated in the general election.
The Arizona House of Representatives held elections for all 60 seats. The Republican majority in the House of Representatives was reduced from 35-25 to 31-29. 1 Democratic incumbent and two Republican incumbents were defeated in the principal. Three Republican incumbents were defeated in the full general election.
National background
On Nov 6, 2018, 87 of the nation's 99 state legislative chambers held regularly scheduled elections for half dozen,073 of vii,383 total seats, meaning that nearly 82 pct of all state legislative seats were up for ballot.
- Entering the 2022 election, Democrats held 42.half-dozen percent, Republicans held 56.viii per centum, and independents and other parties held 0.half dozen per centum of the seats up for regular ballot.
- Following the 2022 election, Democrats held 47.iii percent, Republicans held 52.3 percent, and independents and other parties held 0.4 per centum of the seats up for regular election.
- A total of 469 incumbents were defeated over the class of the election wheel, with roughly 1-third of them defeated in the primary.
Want more than information?
- Incumbents defeated in 2018's country legislative elections
- 2018 election analysis: Partisan balance of state legislative chambers
- 2018 ballot analysis: Number of state legislators past political party
- 2018 election analysis: State legislative supermajorities
Candidates
-
- Encounter also: Statistics on state legislative candidates, 2018
General election candidates
Write-in candidates
- Ron Ha'o (R), District 22
- Christopher Karpurk (L), District 24
- Julian Szymanski (none), District 27
Primary candidates
Margins of victory
-
- See also: Margin of victory assay for the 2022 state legislative elections
A margin of victory (MOV) assay for the 2022 Arizona House of Representatives races is presented in this section. MOV represents the percentage of total votes that separated the winner and the second-place finisher. For instance, if the winner of a race received 47 per centum of the vote and the second-place finisher received 45 pct of the vote, the MOV is 2 percent.
The table below presents the post-obit figures for each party:
- Elections won
- Elections won by less than 10 percent points
- Elections won without opposition
- Average margin of victory[1]
Arizona House of Representatives: 2022 Margin of Victory Assay | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Elections won [2] | Elections won by less than x% | Unopposed elections | Average margin of victory[ane] |
Democratic | | | | |
Republican | | | | |
Other | | | | |
Full [three] | | | | |
The margin of victory in each race is presented below. The list is sorted from the closest MOV to the largest (including unopposed races). Ruddy dots represent Republicans, blue dots represent Democrats, and dark-green dots represent Green Party candidates. Candidates are ordered from left to correct based on their share of the vote. The margin of victory is the margin between the bottom-place winner and the summit-place losing candidate.
Arizona House of Representatives: 2022 Margin of Victory by Commune | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
District | Winning Party | Losing Political party | Margin of Victory | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
| | |
| | | | |
| |
| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | |
Seats flipped
- Run into as well: State legislative seats that changed party control, 2018
The below map displays each seat in the Arizona House of Representatives which changed partisan hands every bit a event of the 2022 elections, shaded according to the partisan affiliation of the winner in 2018. Hover over a shaded commune for more than data.
Country legislative seats flipped in 2018, Arizona House of Representatives | |||
---|---|---|---|
District | Incumbent | 2018 winner | Direction of flip |
Arizona Firm of Representatives District 10 | Todd Clodfelter | Domingo Degrazia | R to D |
Arizona House of Representatives Commune 17 | J.D. Mesnard | Jennifer Pawlik | R to D |
Arizona House of Representatives District 18 | Jill Norgaard | Jennifer Jermaine | R to D |
Arizona Firm of Representatives District 28 | Maria Syms | Aaron Lieberman | R to D |
Incumbents retiring
Nineteen incumbents did not run for re-election in 2018.[4] Those incumbents were:
Name | Political party | Current Office |
---|---|---|
Sally Ann Gonzales | Democratic | House District three |
Macario Saldate | Democratic | House Commune 3 |
Brenda Barton | Republican | House District six |
Wenona Benally | Democratic | House District 7 |
Eric Descheenie | Democratic | Business firm District seven |
Vince Leach | Republican | Business firm District 11 |
Eddie Farnsworth | Republican | House District 12 |
Drew John | Republican | House Commune 14 |
Heather Carter | Republican | House District fifteen |
Doug Coleman | Republican | House District 16 |
J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Firm Commune 17 |
Marking Cardenas | Democratic | House Commune 19 |
Paul Boyer | Republican | House Commune 20 |
David Livingston | Republican | House District 22 |
Michelle Ugenti-Rita | Republican | Business firm Commune 23 |
Lela Alston | Autonomous | Firm District 24 |
Rebecca Rios | Autonomous | House District 27 |
Ray Martinez | Democratic | Firm Commune 30 |
Tony Navarrete | Democratic | Firm Commune xxx |
Process to become a candidate
-
- Run across also: Ballot admission requirements for political candidates in Arizona
Come across statutes: Title xvi, Affiliate 3 of the Arizona Revised Statutes
Candidates in Arizona can access the election as political political party candidates, contained candidates, or write-in candidates. Before any candidate can have contributions, make expenditures, distribute campaign literature, or broadcast petitions, he or she must file a "Political Committee Statement of System" or a "$500 Threshold Exemption Statement." All candidates file with the Arizona Secretary of State.[five]
Political party candidates
Political party candidates are nominated in primary elections. If no candidate is nominated at the principal election for a specific role, no candidate for that function tin can appear on the general election ballot for that political party.[6] [vii]
A political party candidate must file his or her nomination documents during the candidate filing period, which begins 120 days before the principal and ends xc days before the main. At the time of filing, a candidate must exist a qualified voter residing in the geographic area represented by the office existence sought. The post-obit documents must be filed in society to gain election access:[8]
- a fiscal disclosure statement
- an affidavit affirming that the candidate volition be eligible to hold office if elected
- a nomination paper including the post-obit information:
- candidate's residence address
- name of the political party with which the candidate is affiliated
- office the candidate seeks, with district or precinct, if applicable
- the candidate'south name as the candidate wishes it to appear on the ballot
- date of the primary and corresponding general election
- a nomination petition
Nomination petitions must be signed by qualified electors who are eligible to vote for the office the candidate is seeking. A qualified signer may be a "registered member of the party from which the candidate is seeking nomination," a "registered member of a political party that is not entitled to continued representation on the ballot," or an independent. To summate the number of petition signatures needed, the voter registration totals as of March ane of the twelvemonth of the election must be used. Signature requirements vary co-ordinate to the office being sought. See the table below for further details.[ix] [10]
Formulas for determining signature requirements for political party candidates | ||
---|---|---|
Office sought | Minimum signatures required | Maximum signatures allowed |
United States Senator or state executive role | At least one-fourth of 1 percent of the total number of qualified signers** | No more than 10 percentage of the total number of qualified signers |
United states of america Representative | At least one-half of 1 percent of the total number of qualified signers in the commune the candidate seeks to represent | No more than 10 percent of the total number of qualified signers in the district the candidate seeks to represent |
Land legislative office | At to the lowest degree one-half of 1 percent of the total number of qualified signers in the commune the candidate seeks to represent | No more than than 3 percent of the total number of qualified signers in the district the candidate seeks to represent |
**Note: In July 2014, the Arizona Secretary of State announced that the state would no longer enforce a requirement that signatures come up from at least three counties in the state. The decision was made following a lawsuit filed by the Arizona Public Integrity Alliance and four Maricopa Canton voters. The suit alleged that this requirement violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by "impermissibly diluting the value of signatures from citizens in more populous counties and increasing the value of signatures from citizens in less populous counties."[11] |
Newly qualified political party candidates
A candidate of a newly qualified political political party must file the same documents at the same time as other political party candidates. Petition signature requirements are different for newly qualified party candidates. A candidate of a new political political party must file signatures equal to at least one-tenth of one percent of the total votes cast for the winning presidential or gubernatorial candidate at the last general election in the district the candidate seeks to correspond.[9]
For example, in 2012, 1,233,654 votes were cast for Mitt Romney, the winning presidential candidate in Arizona, meaning that new party candidates seeking country executive office in 2022 needed to collect i,234 signatures on their qualifying petitions.[12]
Independent candidates
A candidate may not run as an contained if he or she is representing a political party that failed to authorize for the primary ballot. Additionally, a candidate cannot run as an independent if he or she tried and failed to qualify every bit a political party candidate in the principal.[13]
An independent candidate must be nominated by petition to run in the general election. The nomination petition must be filed with the financial disclosure argument during the candidate filing menstruation, which begins 120 days before the primary election and ends 90 days before the main ballot.[xiii]
An independent candidate's nomination petition must exist signed by registered voters eligible to vote for the office the candidate is seeking. The number of signatures required on the petition is equal to at least iii pct of all registered voters who are not affiliated with a recognized political party in the district the candidate seeks to stand for. Signature requirement figures should exist calculated using voter registration data from March 1 of the twelvemonth of the election. Though the number of signatures required to gain ballot access equally an independent is related to the number of registered voters who are not affiliated with recognized political parties, the affiliation of those signing the petitions does non matter as long as they take not already signed a political political party candidate's petition.[13]
Write-in candidates
A candidate may non file as a write-in if any of the post-obit are true:[14]
- The candidate ran in the primary ballot and failed to go elected.
- The candidate did not file enough signatures to exist allowed election access when previously filing for chief ballot access.
- The candidate filed nomination petitions to run in the full general ballot but did non submit plenty valid signatures to gain election admission.
Write-in votes volition not be counted unless the write-in candidate files a nomination newspaper and financial disclosure form no later than 5 p.m. on the 40th 24-hour interval earlier the election in which the candidate intends to run. The nomination paper must include the following information:[14]
- the candidate's proper name and signature
- the candidate'south residence accost or description of place of residence and mail service office address
- the candidate'southward age
- the length of time the candidate has been a resident of the state
- the candidate'south date of nativity
Qualifications
-
- See also: State legislature candidate requirements by state
Article 4, Role ii, Department 2 of the Arizona Constitution states: "No person shall exist a fellow member of the Legislature unless he shall be a citizen of the United States at the time of his election, nor unless he shall be at least twenty-5 years of age, and shall have been a resident of Arizona at least three years and of the county from which he is elected at least one year earlier his election."
Salaries and per diem
-
- Come across also: Comparison of state legislative salaries
State legislators | |
---|---|
Salary | Per diem |
$24,000/year | For legislators residing within Maricopa County: $35/day for the first 120 days of regular and special sessions and $10/day for all following days. For legislators residing outside of Maricopa County: $151/day for the first 120 days of regular and special sessions for lodging and $56 for meals. That rate would be cutting in half afterward the 120th twenty-four hours. The per diem for legislators residing exterior of Maricopa Canton is tied to the federal charge per unit. |
When sworn in
-
- Encounter also: When state legislators assume office later on a general ballot
Arizona legislators assume office on the outset day of the session later they are elected. Each regular session begins on the second Monday in January.
Arizona political history
-
- See besides: Partisan composition of country houses and State government trifectas
Party control
2018
In the 2022 elections, the Republican majority in the Arizona House of Representatives was reduced from 35-25 to 31-29.
Arizona House of Representatives | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Every bit of November half-dozen, 2018 | After November 7, 2018 | |
Democratic Party | 25 | 29 | |
Republican Party | 35 | 31 | |
Total | sixty | sixty |
2016
In the 2022 elections, the Republican bulk in the Arizona House of Representatives shrank from 36-24 to 35-25.
Arizona House of Representatives | |||
---|---|---|---|
Political party | As of November seven, 2016 | Afterward Nov 8, 2016 | |
Autonomous Party | 24 | 25 | |
Republican Party | 36 | 35 | |
Total | threescore | 60 |
Trifectas
A state authorities trifecta is a term that describes single-party authorities, when ane political political party holds the governor's office and has majorities in both chambers of the legislature in a land government. Republicans in Arizona gained a state government trifecta following the 2008 elections. From 1992 to 2017, Republicans held trifecta status for 17 years, from 1993 to 2001 and from 2009 to 2017.
Arizona Political party Control: 1992-2022
No Autonomous trifectas •Twenty-two years of Republican trifectas
Gyre left and right on the tabular array beneath to view more years.
Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | xx | 21 | 22 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Senate | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | Southward | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
House | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Touch of term limits
-
- See also: Touch of term limits on state representative elections in 2022 and Touch of term limits on country legislative elections in 2018
The Arizona House of Representatives has been a term-limited state business firm since Arizona passed Suggestion 107 in 1992. Arizona representatives serve two-twelvemonth terms with a 4-term/8-year term limit. Arizona'due south term limits apply to parts of terms and not just full terms.
All 60 seats in the Arizona Firm of Representatives were up for election in 2018. In the 2022 elections, 8 representatives were ineligible to run because of term limits. The following state representatives were term limited in 2018:
Democratic: (three)
- Sally Ann Gonzales
- Macario Saldate
- Lela Alston
Republicans (five):
- Brenda Barton
- Eddie Farnsworth
- Heather Carter
- J.D. Mesnard
- Michelle Ugenti-Rita
Of the 87 country legislative chambers that held elections in 2018, 24 of them—12 senate chambers and 12 house chambers—included incumbents who were unable to run for re-ballot due to term limits.[15] In the 24 chambers affected by term limits in 2018, one,463 seats were upwards for election.[16] The Nevada Senate, Arkansas House, and Arkansas Senate are impacted past term limits, but no incumbents were term-limited in 2018. There are 99 chambers throughout the country.
A total of 271 state legislators—96 state senators and 175 country representatives—were ineligible to run in the 2022 elections because of term limits. This represented 4 percentage of the 6,066 total seats up for election in November 2018.[17] [18] Republicans had twice as many land legislators term-limited in 2022 as Democrats. A total of 86 Democrats were term-limited, while 177 Republicans were term-limited.
Moving ridge election analysis
- See also: Wave elections (1918-2016)
The term wave election is oft used to describe an election bicycle in which one party makes significant balloter gains. How many seats would Republicans have had to lose for the 2022 midterm election to be considered a wave election?
Ballotpedia examined the results of the 50 election cycles that occurred betwixt 1918 and 2016—spanning from President Woodrow Wilson's (D) 2nd midterm in 1918 to Donald Trump's (R) starting time presidential election in 2016. We define wave elections as the 20 percentage of elections in that menses resulting in the greatest seat swings confronting the president's party.
Applying this definition to state legislative elections, we found that Republicans needed to lose 494 seats for 2022 to qualify as a wave election.
The chart below shows the number of seats the president's party lost in the 10 state legislative waves from 1918 to 2016. Click here to read the full report.
State legislative wave elections | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | President | Party | Election type | State legislative seats modify | Elections analyzed [nineteen] | |
1932 | Hoover | R | Presidential | -1,022 | 7,365 | |
1922 | Harding | R | First midterm | -907 | 6,907 | |
1966 | Johnson | D | First midterm[twenty] | -782 | 7,561 | |
1938 | Roosevelt | D | Second midterm | -769 | vii,179 | |
1958 | Eisenhower | R | Second midterm | -702 | 7,627 | |
2010 | Obama | D | Commencement midterm | -702 | 7,306 | |
1974 | Ford | R | 2nd midterm[21] | -695 | 7,481 | |
1920 | Wilson | D | Presidential | -654 | vi,835 | |
1930 | Hoover | R | Presidential | -640 | 7,361 | |
1954 | Eisenhower | R | First midterm | -494 | 7,513 |
Competitiveness
Every yr, Ballotpedia uses official candidate lists from each state to examine the competitiveness of every country legislative race in the country. Nationally, there has been a steady decline in electoral competitiveness since 2010. Nearly notable is that the number of districts with full general election contest has dropped by more than than 10 pct.
Results from 2016
Below is Ballotpedia's 2022 competitiveness analysis. Click here to read the full written report »
Historical context
-
- Run into too: Competitiveness in State Legislative Elections: 1972-2014
Uncontested elections: In 2014, 32.viii per centum of Americans lived in states with an uncontested country senate election. Similarly, twoscore.iv percent of Americans lived in states with uncontested house elections. Primary elections were uncontested even more oftentimes, with 61 percent of people living in states with no contested primaries. Uncontested elections often occur in locations that are and so politically one-sided that the result of an election would be a foregone conclusion regardless of whether it was contested or not.
Open seats: In most cases, an incumbent will run for re-election, which decreases the number of open seats bachelor. In 2014, 83 percent of the 6,057 seats up for election saw the incumbent running for re-ballot. United states that impose term limits on their legislatures typically see a higher pct of open up seats in a given twelvemonth considering a portion of incumbents in each election are forced to leave office. Overall, the number of open seats decreased from 2012 to 2014, dropping from 21.ii percent in 2012 to 17.0 per centum in 2014.
Incumbent win rates: Ballotpedia's competitiveness analysis of elections betwixt 1972 and 2022 documented the high propensity for incumbents to win re-election in state legislative elections. In fact, since 1972, the win rate for incumbents had not dropped beneath 90 percent—with the exception of 1974, when 88 percentage of incumbents were re-elected to their seats. Maybe most chiefly, the win rate for incumbents generally increased over time. In 2014, 96.5 percent of incumbents were able to retain their seats. Common convention holds that incumbents are able to leverage their office to maintain their seat. However, the high incumbent win charge per unit may actually be a result of incumbents being more probable to concur seats in districts that are considered safe for their political party.
Marginal primaries: Often, competitiveness is measured by examining the rate of elections that have been won past amounts that are considered marginal (5 percent or less). During the 2022 election, xc.1 percent of primary and general ballot races were won by margins higher than 5 percent. Interestingly, it is usually the instance that just one of the two races—primary or general—volition be competitive at a time. This means that if a district's general election is competitive, typically one or more of the commune'south primaries were won past more than 5 percent. The reverse is besides truthful: If a district sees a competitive primary, it is unlikely that the full general ballot for that commune will be won past less than 5 percent. Primaries often see very low voter turnout in comparison to general elections. In 2014, there were only 27 million voters for country legislative primaries, but approximately 107 million voters for the state legislative full general elections.
Pivot Counties
-
- See besides: Pivot Counties by land
Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with virtually beingness concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states. No counties in Arizona are Pivot Counties.
Donald Trump (R) defeated Hillary Clinton (D) in the 2022 presidential ballot. Trump won 48.seven percent of the vote, while Clinton won 45.1 percent. Arizona was one of 12 key battleground states in 2016. Of the xxx states won by Trump in 2016, Arizona had the 5th closest margin. From when information technology became a state in 1912 to 2016, Arizona voted Republican in 66.7 percent of presidential elections. Information technology voted Republican in all presidential elections from 2000 to 2016.
Presidential results by legislative commune
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2022 presidential elections by land House districts in Arizona. Click [show] to aggrandize the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2022 full general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2022 presidential elections cleaved down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[22] [23]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 12 out of 30 country House districts in Arizona with an boilerplate margin of victory of 25 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 14 out of 30 state House districts in Arizona with an average margin of victory of 27.v points. Clinton won two districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2022 elections.
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 18 out of 30 state House districts in Arizona with an boilerplate margin of victory of 22.9 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won sixteen out of 30 state Business firm districts in Arizona with an boilerplate margin of victory of 21.five points.
2016 presidential results past state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | xxx.ane% | 68.two% | R+38.2 | 28.6% | 66.9% | R+38.3 | R |
ii | 57.2% | 41.6% | D+15.seven | 59.4% | 36.1% | D+23.2 | D |
3 | 70.0% | 28.i% | D+41.ix | seventy.2% | 24.4% | D+45.8 | D |
four | 54.3% | 44.2% | D+10.two | 56.eight% | 38.2% | D+eighteen.7 | D |
5 | 28.1% | 70.0% | R+41.9 | 22.2% | 73.5% | R+51.iii | R |
six | 42.ii% | 55.6% | R+13.4 | 41.7% | 52.1% | R+10.4 | R |
7 | 63.2% | 35.iv% | D+27.8 | 59.8% | 34.one% | D+25.7 | D |
8 | 44.7% | 53.5% | R+viii.viii | twoscore.2% | 54.half-dozen% | R+14.four | R |
ix | 53.iv% | 44.ix% | D+8.four | 56.eight% | 37.9% | D+18.nine | D |
10 | 51.8% | 46.five% | D+5.4 | 52.nine% | 41.vi% | D+11.four | D |
11 | 39.vii% | 59.0% | R+xix.3 | twoscore.6% | 54.five% | R+13.ix | R |
12 | 32.5% | 65.9% | R+33.iv | 34.viii% | 59.3% | R+24.5 | R |
13 | 33.5% | 65.1% | R+31.half dozen | 34.1% | 61.1% | R+27 | R |
fourteen | 35.7% | 62.v% | R+26.viii | 33.6% | 59.9% | R+26.2 | R |
15 | 36.4% | 61.ix% | R+25.four | 39.1% | 55.7% | R+16.half-dozen | R |
sixteen | 35.0% | 63.ane% | R+28.1 | 32.nine% | 61.3% | R+28.iv | R |
17 | 42.1% | 56.2% | R+14.ii | 45.1% | 49.ii% | R+four.i | R |
18 | 48.1% | 50.0% | R+ane.9 | 51.ix% | 41.5% | D+10.iv | R |
19 | 66.4% | 32.i% | D+34.3 | 67.4% | 27.2% | D+forty.3 | D |
20 | 42.4% | 55.three% | R+12.9 | 42.7% | l.7% | R+8 | R |
21 | 40.6% | 58.0% | R+17.4 | 39.8% | 55.0% | R+15.2 | R |
22 | 33.iv% | 65.four% | R+31.9 | 33.7% | 62.one% | R+28.4 | R |
23 | 35.ix% | 62.ix% | R+26.nine | 41.2% | 54.half dozen% | R+13.3 | R |
24 | 63.two% | 34.4% | D+28.8 | 65.nine% | 27.7% | D+38.3 | D |
25 | 33.1% | 65.one% | R+31.ix | 35.one% | 58.7% | R+23.6 | R |
26 | 58.3% | 38.5% | D+nineteen.8 | 59.4% | 31.9% | D+27.5 | D |
27 | 75.two% | 23.2% | D+52 | 74.1% | 20.6% | D+53.5 | D |
28 | 44.six% | 53.6% | R+ix | 49.9% | 44.6% | D+5.3 | R |
29 | 64.7% | 33.6% | D+31.i | 65.0% | 29.iii% | D+35.7 | D |
30 | 61.3% | 36.seven% | D+24.7 | 62.2% | 31.vii% | D+30.five | D |
Total | 44.six% | 53.7% | R+nine.ane | 45.5% | 49.0% | R+3.6 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
See too
- Arizona House of Representatives
- Arizona State Legislature
- State legislative elections, 2018
- Arizona state legislative Autonomous primaries, 2018
- Arizona state legislative Republican primaries, 2018
External links
- Arizona State Legislature
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 one.1 Excludes unopposed elections
- ↑ Defined equally the number of districts where at to the lowest degree one of this party's candidates won.
- ↑ These numbers are lower than the sum of the figures found in the above rows due to the presence of multimember districts.
- ↑ Ballotpedia defines an incumbent equally retiring if the incumbent did not file for office or filed for office but withdrew, was butterfingers, or otherwise left a race in a manner other than losing the master, main runoff, or convention. If an incumbent runs equally a write-in candidate, Ballotpedia does not consider them to be retiring. If an incumbent runs in the same sleeping accommodation for a different seat, Ballotpedia does not consider them to be retiring.
- ↑ Arizona Secretarial assistant of State, "Candidate Checklist," accessed March 17, 2014
- ↑ Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title 16, Chapter 3, Section 301," accessed March 17, 2014
- ↑ Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title 16, Chapter 3, Section 302," accessed March 17, 2014
- ↑ Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title 16, Chapter 3, Department 311," accessed March 17, 2014
- ↑ ix.0 9.ane Arizona Revised Statutes, "Championship 16, Chapter 3, Section 322," accessed March 17, 2014
- ↑ Arizona Land Legislature, "HB 2608," accessed Apr 15, 2015
- ↑ Ballot Law Weblog, "Citizens Successfully Challenge Unconstitutional Arizona Ballot Access Law," July 24, 2014
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "Federal Elections 2012," Updated July 2013
- ↑ 13.0 xiii.one xiii.2 Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title 16, Chapter iii, Section 341," accessed March 17, 2014
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title sixteen, Affiliate iii, Department 312," accessed March 17, 2014
- ↑ The Nevada Senate, Arkansas Firm, and Arkansas Senate were up for election in 2022 and have term limits, but no incumbents were term-limited in 2018.
- ↑ The Nevada Senate, Arkansas House, and Arkansas Senate are impacted by term limits, but no incumbents were term-express in 2018. In the three chambers, a total of 129 seats were up for ballot in 2018. No legislators were unable to run in 2022 in those three chamber considering of term limits.
- ↑ Ballotpedia confirmed through phone calls that at least seven California legislators were term-express in 2018. The number of California legislators term-express and the overall number of term-limited country legislators had a adventure to change if Ballotpedia could ostend that more members were term-limited in 2018.
- ↑ Some of the 271 term-express land legislators in 2022 may resign before their term ends. These legislators were still counted in the total number of term-limited legislators in 2018.
- ↑ The number of state legislative seats available for assay varied, with as many as 7,795 and as few as 6,835.
- ↑ Lyndon Johnson's (D) first term began in November 1963 after the death of President John F. Kennedy (D), who was first elected in 1960. Before Johnson had his first midterm in 1966, he was re-elected president in 1964.
- ↑ Gerald Ford'due south (R) first term began in Baronial 1974 post-obit the resignation of President Richard Nixon (R), who was first elected in 1968 and was re-elected in 1972. Because Ford merely served for two full months earlier facing the electorate, this election is classified as Nixon's second midterm.
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2022 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February vi, 2017
Leadership
Speaker of the House:Russell Bowers
Representatives
Republican Political party (31)
Democratic Party (29)
2018 Elections to State legislatures | ||
---|---|---|
State Senate elections | Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kentucky • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Isle • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Washington • Westward Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming | |
State House elections | Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Missouri • Montana • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Washington • Westward Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming |
Source: https://ballotpedia.org/Arizona_House_of_Representatives_elections,_2018
0 Response to "Arizona Us House of Representatives Election Results 2018"
แสดงความคิดเห็น